MW 1991 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Road Test

MW 1991 Chevrolet Caprice Classic

Share and Enjoy:

No related posts.

25 Comments - “MW 1991 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Road Test”

HAMOoOoDQ8 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
hey guys can any one tell me, what interior’s car in 0:41 ?
Ragingfish93 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Whhoooo this is the most comfortable car i’ve ever ridden in. our family has one i’m driving it to high school every day. My Grandfather bought it off the show room floor. it’s now got 277,000 miles on it….all stock!!!!!
hizay wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Lol @ the music
hizay wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
I just like plain lookin Caprices. So I watched the video.
Greenmyth75 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
I remember when the 91’s came out, and how cool I thought they were. I can’t believe it’s been almost 20 years – man, I feel old!
pinkcheckerd wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
thank you for posting this!
I really love this old styled chevys of the 90s^^
StrongEnough78 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Power leather seats, pull straps on the doors, low fuel, coolant, washer fluid and oil warning lights. A towing package and the LTZ sport handling package. In 1992 you also got the digital speedometer, with analog tach, volt meter, oil pressure, fuel, and engine temp gauges. That wasn’t available in 1991 but they added it in 1992. Also different styles of wheel covers or rims.
DCrepresenter wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Options like what?
StrongEnough78 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
I’m glad the 350 cu in (5.7 liter) V-8 became an option for civilian models in 1992 as well as a speedo that reads to 100 instead of 85. I was so surprised to find this on here and am quite happy about it. I have a 92 Caprice with the 5.0 liter V-8 with over 260,000 miles on that engine. Still runs strong and smooth. She’s showing some age on the interior but I do plan to start fixing her up and keeping her looking and running great. They are right though, for such a large car they handle great!
StrongEnough78 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
The Caprice was the baseline model, the Caprice Classic was the more top of the line model, there were a few options you couldn’t get on the Base Caprice that you could get on the Classic.
DCrepresenter wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
What the difference between the regular Caprice and the Caprice Classic.
Roadball wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
I loved the design 7 years ago, but now looking at the specs, for a 5 liter V8, it’s horrible. Still, I’d love to try one out just for old times sake
gregrudd wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Yes Holden put a lot of effort into converting their V8 to Fuel injection. It used multipoint Bosch injection and new free breathing heads with rounded ports and bigger valves, thus giving a very substantial power improvement. I have heard stories of Holden designing a prototype DOHC V8 using a lot of parts from the Family 2 engine. But it was squashed in favor of the Chev V8
gregrudd wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
It called emission controls! When the big Euro Cars in the late 70’s early 80’s were tuned to to run on unleaded set up to meet US regs they ended up using more fuel than a Big Block and had just as much problems keeping tune as a US engine did. The ultimate solution to this was the introduction of sequential multipont electronic fuel injection which didn’t become a reality until the late 80’s
somewhatlongdong wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
an excellent vehicle for police.
1ChevyGuy375 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Thanks for posting this, I enjoyed watching an old clip of Motor Week and realy enjoyed that they reviewed the Caprice!
jduffield1981 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
i love my 91 caprice its fast and very well made unlike the cars of today
robertbalboni wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
This was probably the lowest point in GM history, the cars looks are an abortion and its engineering is 13 years old at introduction.
winningcirclemedia wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
they seem to just stick to the facts so noty to appear to favor any brand. but some cars were just shit and id love to hear them admit it !!!!!
bajabusta wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Yes. They are out there. I don’t remember which ones however, but was shocked when they aired.
EdwardJellico wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Did MotorWeek EVER give anything a bad review? I’ve never seen one.
Stapletube wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
I miss my 91 Caprice with 307000Km
Airox2009 wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
That`s because those cars are way lighter. The Caprice weighs over 4000 pounds!
betekvs wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
the 96 Impala had the same chassis as the Caprice, just different bumpers.
DRcaprice wrote on March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
its a family sedan package, so that means its not a car built for racing. its a great car to cruse around in. but still, a 5.0 should put out atleast 200 hp.

Page 1 of 0